Stein v. Golden Rule
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Ramsey county to compel defendant to remove window shutters and a sign on plaintiff’s side of a party wall, and for $500 damages. The case was tried before Bunn, J., and a jury to which was submitted the question of damages. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of defendant. Plaintiff moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.
Read the full summary
Action in the district court for Ramsey county to compel defendant to remove window shutters and a sign on plaintiff’s side of a party wall, and for $500 damages. The case was tried before Bunn, J., and a jury to which was submitted the question of damages. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of defendant. Plaintiff moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The court made findings upon the matters by the court reserved for the court and ordered judgment directing defendant to remove the sign and the projecting fixtures. From the judgment entered pursuant to the order, defendant…
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
Appeal by the defendant from the judgment of the district court of the county of Ramsey adjudging that the plaintiff recover from the defendant the possession of all that part of the lot, described therein, which lies south of the party wall, on the north side of the lot, used and occupied by the defendant by maintaining shutters and a sign attached to the south face of the wall.
This case is in many of its facts similar to that of Stein v. Berrisford, supra, page 177, 121 N. W. 879 ; but the question presented by *183the record in this case was not involved in the other case. The defendant herein…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Johnson v. Minnesota Tribune Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Stein v. BerrisfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
3Cited by2 opinions
- Washington-Virginia Railway Co. v. HimelrightDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1914
- Pittsburg County Ry. Co. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925