Legal Opinion

Alvarado v. Doe

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 13, 1995No. 94-CA-2366PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

|2SCHOTT, Chief Judge.

In Alvarado v. Doe, 613 So.2d 166 (La. App. 4 Cir.1992), writs denied 614 So.2d 64 (La.1993), this court held that the Western Woz’ld Insurance policy did not cover the incident sued on because of an exclusion in the policy with respect to damages arising out of assault and battery or the prevention or suppression thereof.

After our opinion, plaintiff returned to the trial court and filed a third supplemental petition in which he alleged that his damages were caused either by the negligent acts of Teany while in the course and scope of his employment (Western World’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Alvarado v. DoeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Maise v. Cat's Meow, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API