Legal Opinion
Shore Bank v. Harvard
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided March 8, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2:12cv336PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MARK S. DAVIS, District Judge.
This matter is currently before the Court on Defendant Scott C. Harvard’s (“Harvard”) motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. After examining the Complaint, Harvard’s motion to dismiss and the associated memoranda, the Court finds that the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented and oral argument would not aid in the decisional process. Fed.R.Civ.P. 78(b); E:D. Va. Loe. Civ. R. 7(J). The matter is therefore ripe for decision. For the reasons set forth below, the…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kettler International, Inc. v. Starbucks Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014
- Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. v. HarvardSupreme Court of Virginia · 2016
- Colonial Penniman, LLC v. Williams (In re Colonial Penniman, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2017
- Virginia International Terminals v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014
- IQVIA Inc. v. KhanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.