Legal Opinion

People v. Singh

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 2012Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Miriam Cyrulnik, J.

Defendant stands indicted for predatory sexual assault, rape in the first degree, and other charges. By omnibus motion, defendant moves for a variety of relief. Defendant’s requests are decided as follows:

Grand Jury Minutes

Defendant’s motion to inspect the grand jury minutes is granted. Upon an examination of the minutes of the grand jury proceedings, the court finds that the evidence before the grand jury was legally sufficient to establish the offenses charged and that the defendant committed said offenses (see CPL 190.65, *912210.20, 210.30; People v…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. People v. VentimigliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. People v. PelchatNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. People v. Calbud, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. People v. ClaytonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API