Legal Opinion

Appalachian States Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission v. Hon. Hazel O'leary, in Her Official Capacity as Secretary of Energy

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 20, 1996No. 95-7382PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROTH, Circuit Judge:

In this appeal, we must evaluate the Secretary of Labor’s interpretation of the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985 (“LLRW Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2021b-2021j, under the standard set forth in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 104 S.Ct. 2778, 81 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984). We hold that the Secretary’s interpretation was a permissible reading of an ambiguous statute and is properly accorded deference. We will therefore reverse the district court’s decision and enter judgment for the Secretary.

I

This…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Zheng Zheng v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  2. Joseph R. Matczak v. Frankford Candy and Chocolate Company, Joseph MatczakCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  3. Levy v. Sterling Holding Co., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  4. Colacicco v. Apotex, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Knipe v. SmithKline BeechamDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API