Lewis v. Walker's Exrs.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeals, Nos. 201 and 222, Oct. T., 1894, by plaintiff and defendants, from decree of O. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., July T., 1892, No. 130, on bill in equity. Bill for injunction to restrain exercise of acts of ownership in and upon burial lot.
Read the full summary
Appeals, Nos. 201 and 222, Oct. T., 1894, by plaintiff and defendants, from decree of O. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., July T., 1892, No. 130, on bill in equity. Bill for injunction to restrain exercise of acts of ownership in and upon burial lot. The case was referred to William P. Schell, Jr., Esq., as master, who recommended- a decree in accordance with the prayers of the bill, restraining defendants from interfering with the lot, and also directing that defendants should erect a new monument in place of the marble one which one of the defendants had defaced. The defacement consisted in cutting…
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam,
After a very patient examination of this case we are con*34vinced that the opinion of the learned'court below accomplishes absolute justice between these litigant parties and on that opinion we affirm the decree.
The decree of the court below is affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellant.
2Cited by6 opinions
- McAndrew v. QuirkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
- Kirby v. KirbySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Silvia v. HelgerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1949
- In Re Estate of DerifieldOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Persinger v. PersingerFayette County Court of Common Pleas · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.