Legal Opinion

Schults v. BD. OF EDUC. OF TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 1, 1965PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

We agree with the Appellate Division’s determination (86 N. J. Super. 29 (1964)) that the plaintiffs should first have exhausted their administrative remedies before the Commissioner and State Board of Education. The dismissal of their complaint is:

Affirmed.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Hall, Schettino and Haneman — 6. For reversal — None.

2Cases cited1 opinion

Schults v. Bd. of Ed. of TeaneckNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964

3Cited by8 opinions

Board of Education v. Board of Education v. Board of EducationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
Scott v. Town of BloomfieldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
Silverman v. BD. OF ED., TP. OF MILLBURNNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
Katz v. BD. OF TRUSTEES, GLOUCESTER CTY. COL.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
DeCamp Bus Lines v. TRANSPORTATION DEP'TNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.