Legal Opinion · Dissent

Orie v. Stone

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1992No. 1884Published

1DissentFord Elliott, Judge

I must respectfully dissent from the Opinion of the majority. As is the case with any appeal that comes before our court, the initial concern upon which we must focus our attention is whether our court has jurisdiction to hear the appeal. Because I find that the present appeal is interlocutory in nature, I am of the opinion that this court lacks *490jurisdiction to hear this appeal, and that the appeal should therefore be quashed.1

It is well settled that an appeal will lie only from a final order unless otherwise permitted by statute. Praisner v. Stocker, 313 Pa.Super. 332, 459 A.2d 1255 (1983).…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pugar v. GrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Praisner v. StockerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Luckenbaugh v. ShearerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Suburban East Tires, Inc. v. Duquesne Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API