Legal Opinion

Gillett v. Waldorf Hotel Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1925No. 19359. Department OnePublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAskren, J.

— This is an appeal from a judgment of the court denying recovery in an action to recover for valuables,-lost while guests of a hotel.

The facts follow: Appellants, in August, 1923, registered at respondent’s hotel, and were assigned to' room 333. Retiring that evening at 10:30, both appellants tried the door of their room to ascertain if it was locked. The door was fitted with what is commonly known as a Yale lock, with a flat key being used for the purpose of entering the room. The lock had what is known as a spring catch which does not require the use of a key to open the door from the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Murchison v. SergentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  2. Wagner v. Congress Square Hotel Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1916
  3. Watt v. KilburyWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Nesben v. JacksonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Olson v. CrossmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shifflette v. LillyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Goodwin v. Georgian Hotel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Featherstone v. DessertWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Levesque v. Columbia HotelSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1945
  5. Cline v. DimmickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API