Legal Opinion

State v. Scott

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 20, 1979No. 18-124 (78-8354), CA 11993PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, J.

The defendant appeals his conviction of burglary in the first degree of a railroad boxcar. After a trial to the court, the defendant moved for a judgment of acquittal on the ground that a railroad boxcar is not a building as used in the Oregon burglary statutes and he assigns the denial of his motion as error on appeal.

ORS 164.205(1) defines "building” as used in the burglary statutes:

" 'Building/ in addition to its ordinary meaning, includes any booth, vehicle, boat, aircraft or other structure adapted for overnight accommodation of persons or for carrying on business therein. Where a…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Darrel Duane GriselCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. State v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. State v. LambertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. Timothy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2004
  5. State v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API