Legal Opinion

Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 3, 1939No. 133PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Reed

The Interstate Commerce Commission entered an order on February 2, 1937, which directed certain carriers serving the Port of New York district to cease and desist on or before April 5, 1937, from permitting shippers in interstate commerce over the carriers’ lines from occupying “space by lease or otherwise in warehouses, buildings or on piers owned or controlled directly or indirectly by, or affiliated with” the carriers involved “at rates and charges which failed to compensate said” carriers “for the cost of providing said space.” The cease and desist order likewise directed the carriers to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. North Carolina Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. McCueSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. GillSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Merchants Warehouse Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Smelting Refining & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Lowden v. Simonds-Shields-Lonsdale Grain Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Northern Natural Gas Co. v. GroundsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  5. Union Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API