Legal Opinion

Beard v. International Business Machines Corporation

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 9, 2020No. 3:18-cv-06783Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 JEROME BEARD, 11 Plaintiff, No. C 18-06783 WHA 12 v. 13 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING MACHINES CORPORATION, IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION 14 FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendant. 15 16 17 INTRODUCTION 18 In this employment action arising out of a dispute over commission payments, defendant 19 moves for summary judgment. For the reasons stated herein, defendant’s motion is GRANTED 20 IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. 21 STATEMENT 22 This employment case is a dispute over commissions, not over termination…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Coleman v. Quaker Oats Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API