State v. Phillips
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Per curiam
In State v. Phillips, 234 Or App 676, 229 P3d 631 (2010), defendant appealed from a judgment of contempt, raising four assignments of error. He subsequently filed a pro se supplemental brief raising two additional assignments of error. We rejected his first assignment of error on the ground that it was not preserved, and, in a footnote, we expressly rejected the remaining three assignments of error in his opening brief. In a petition for reconsideration, defendant points out that we did not expressly dispose of the assignments of error in his pro se supplemental brief. Defendant is correct.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010