Legal Opinion

In Re Stratford Lamps, Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 19, 1990No. 19-20877PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BERNARD MARKOVITZ, Bankruptcy Judge.

Carl and Bella Schachter, principals of Debtor, have objected to the distribution of property proposed by the Chapter 7 trustee. They maintain that they are subrogat-ed to the rights of First Seneca Bank, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), and Pittsburgh National Bank (“PNB”) because they, i.e., the Schachters, have paid debts owed by Debtor to these creditors.

For the reasons hereinafter advanced, the objection of the Schachters will be denied and the trustee will be ordered, unless stayed by Order of Court, to proceed with…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fisher v. Outlet Co. (In Re Denby Stores, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  2. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Kaiser Steel Corp. (In Re Kaiser Steel Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1988
  3. Equibank v. Dan-Ver Enterprises, Inc. (In Re Dan-Ver Enterprises, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Creditor's Committee v. Commonwealth, Department of RevenueDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1989
  5. In Re Co-Build Companies, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Felicity Associates, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island · 1996
  2. Michener v. Brady (In Re Brady)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API