David v. Robert Dollar Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). We will first consider the sufficiency of the counterclaim, as a decision of that question will have a material bearing upon the sufficiency of the affirmative defense. Was oral testimony competent to prove the agreement on the part of the plaintiff to advance the sum of $140,000 to enable the defendant to take up and pay off the claims and liens against the mill property?
“There may be instances in which a contract is partly in writing and partly oral, and the two together constitute the contract; so there may be a question of fact as to whether the written…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Thomas v. . ScuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Mobile & Montgomery Railway Co. v. JureySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- McCreary v. Pennsylvania Canal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Bank of British North America v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Murphy v. CraigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928