Legal Opinion

United States v. Sutton

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 1, 2022No. Criminal No. 2021-0598Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Defendant. ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) V. ) Criminal No. 21-0598-01 (PLF) ) TERENCE SUTTON, ) ) ) ) OPINION AND ORDER Defendant Terence Sutton has filed a motion for Brady sanctions, arguing that he has been prejudiced by the government’s failure to timely disclose exculpatory evidence stemming from an apparent eyewitness’s statements. See Mr. Sutton’s Motion for Brady Sanctions (“Mot.”) [Dkt. No. 67]. He asks that the Court order the government to produce every document pertaining to investigators’ and prosecutors’ interactions…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API