Legal Opinion

Kaufmann v. McLaughlin

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1898Published

Action to rescind a sale of real estate on the ground of false representations made by the vendor.

1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.

The plaintiff claims that she, was induced to purchase the house and lot described in the complaint, a five-story tenement, known as No. 338 East Ninety-fourth street, in reliance upon the defendant’s statement that he was about erecting on adjoining land a silk factory which would greatly benefit the premises. The- defendant denies the making of such representations, and states that all that was said on the subject of a silk factory was after the negotiations were closed and the parties went up to look at the property, when the plaintiff asked what was going to be built on the defendant’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Masson v. BovetCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  2. Cobb v. . HatfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Kinney v. . KiernanNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Pickslay v. . StarrNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Hallahan v. WebberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API