Legal Opinion

Public Health Trust of Miami-Dade County v. Metellus

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 1, 2006No. 3D05-1989PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

The defendants in a medical malpractice case appeal from an order granting a new trial after a defense verdict because a serving juror, in answer to a question on voir dire as to whether she had been involved in a “lawsuit,” failed to reveal that she had been in a divorce and was the subject of collection efforts by creditors against her. For two reasons, we reverse for entry of judgment in accordance with the verdict.

First, in the absence of any definition of “lawsuit” which would, as in Roberts v. Tejada, 814 So.2d 334 (Fla.2002), include such proceedings, there was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. De La Rosa v. ZequeiraSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. Roberts Ex Rel. Estate of Roberts v. TejadaSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  3. Freedman v. De La CuestaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bolling v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  2. Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Carl DitmarsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
  3. Kenz v. Miami-Dade CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  4. Weissman v. Radiology Associates of Ocala, P.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API