Legal Opinion

Pearson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 4, 1990No. 89-01469Published

1Opinion of the Court

SCHEB, Acting Chief Judge.

This appeal involves the application of Florida’s no-fault insurance law to a novel factual situation concerning responsibility for payment of Personal Injury Protection (PIP) benefits.

The appellant, Teresa Pearson, was the co-owner, along with her fiance, Robert E. Taylor, of an Oldsmobile car. Taylor carried PIP coverage on the vehicle with State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company under a policy which listed him as the named insured. Pearson, who had no driver’s license and allegedly did not drive, was not listed as an additional named insured under Taylor’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ward v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  2. Epperson v. Dixie Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Industrial Fire & Casualty Insurance v. AugustinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API