Legal Opinion

S. & L. Bldg. Corp. v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 18, 1932No. 41PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

L. HAND, Circuit Judge.

The appeal involves the application of section 212 (d) of the Revenue Act of 1926 (26 USCA § 953 (d), which, although the transactions at bar happened in 1924 and 1925, section 1208 of the act (26 USCA § 953a) made retroactive. It was designed to allow a taxpayer in the case of installment sales to spread the profit over the whole peiiod during which payments were made, so as to avoid loading all of it upon those years which followed the amortization of the original cost. It gave a privilege; “the income •may * * * ° bo returned on the basis and in the manner above…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lucas v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Enoch v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
  2. Buddy Schoellkopf Products, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
  3. Fort Howard Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1994
  4. Pozzi v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1967
  5. Anover Realty Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1960

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API