Legal Opinion
Beights v. W. R. Grace & Co.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided March 5, 1975No. Civ. No. 72-192-DPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DAUGHERTY, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff Beights received personal injuries while using a product known as Lub-adhesive. As he was covered by the Oklahoma Workmen’s Compensation Law at the time of the accident he received certain payments and benefits from Plaintiff United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (USF&G), the compensation carrier. As Plaintiffs herein they have sued Defendants W. R. Grace & Company (Grace) who sold or distributed the product and The Murphy-Phoenix Company, Inc. (Murphy-Phoenix) who manufactured the same. Though given the opportunity…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kirkland v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Peak Drilling Co. v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- Porter v. Norton-Stuart Pontiac-Cadillac of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Anthony J. Rossano, Jr., B/n/f Anthony J. Rossano, Sr. v. Blue Plate Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Anco Mfg. & Supply Company, Inc. v. SwankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Simon II LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002
- Riblet Tramway Co. v. Marathon Electronics-Avtek Drive DivisionSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- TCB Remarketing LLC v. Metro Auto Auction LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023