Rudolph's Appeal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
From the Common Pleas of Philadelphia. Jan. 25. The question was, whether an annuitant under a settlement, was entitled to be paid arrearages out of subsequent rents and profits.
Read the full summary
From the Common Pleas of Philadelphia. Jan. 25. The question was, whether an annuitant under a settlement, was entitled to be paid arrearages out of subsequent rents and profits. By indenture, Rudolph conveyed certain lands to Yogdesin fee, in trust to let and demise the same, and, out of the rents and profits, to pay the interest accruing on certain bonds and mortgages on the lands therein recited, and also to pay taxes, &c.; and, afterwards, to pay the nett revenue, income, and proceeds of the thereby granted premises to said Rudolph, during his life ; and, in case he should leave a widow,…
1Opinion of the CourtBurnside, J.
We all concur in the report of the auditor, who has treated the subject in so lucid and correct a manner, that but little could be added to his reasoning, without weakening the argument. I therefore adopt it as the opinion of the court.
Decree reversed, and report confirmed.
2Cited by6 opinions
- Dwight EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Reed's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- In Re Lowrie's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Smith TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Newlin EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Montgomery County · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.