Legal Opinion

Holt v. Brown

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided May 5, 2016No. C.A. No. 2:14-cv-1823-PMDPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

PATRICK MICHAEL DUFFY, United States District Judge

Plaintiffs Travis and Tiffany Holt brought this admiralty action against Defendant Scott Brown pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(h). The Holts are suing Brown for personal injuries and other damages they sustained as a result of a boating accident involving the Holts, Brown, and one other person.

The Court tried this case without a jury on January 11 and 12, 2016. Having considered the testimony and the exhibits admitted at trial, as well as the parties’ pretrial briefs and post-trial proposed…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. United States v. Reliable Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Sisson v. RubySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  5. Shipes v. Piggly Wiggly St. Andrews, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barnett v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2023
  2. Ellis v. Tall Ships Charleston LLCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2022
  3. In re: Netgain Technology, LLC Consumer Data Breach LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
  4. Meador v. Aramark Sports and Entertainment Services LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API