Legal Opinion
State v. Anderson
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 1, 2011No. 11-106PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GENOVESE, Judge.
| ¶ Defendant, Marcus W. Anderson, appeals his two aggravated burglary convictions and his two forcible rape convictions. He does not appeal his sentences. For the following reasons, we affirm all four convictions.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Defendant, Marcus W. Anderson, was charged by amended bill of information with aggravated burglary of R.G., a violation of La.R.S. 14:60; forcible rape of R.G., a violation of La.R.S. 14:42.1; aggravated burglary of J.S., a violation of La.R.S. 14:60; and, forcible rape of J.S., a violation of La.R.S. 14:42.1. 1 It is alleged in the record…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- State v. HearoldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- Grasser Contracting Co. v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- State v. PrestridgeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. GuilloryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- State v. TylerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- State v. GilliamLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- State v. FlemmingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Commonwealth v. ScottMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.