Legal Opinion

Williams v. Owl Drug Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 13, 1935No. Civ. 10593PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCOMB, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant entered after the trial court granted defendant’s motion for a directed verdict.

Viewing the evidence most favorable to plaintiff (Estate of Flood, 217 Cal. 763, 768 [21 Pac. (2d) 579]), the facts in the instant case are:

Defendant owned and operated a drug store in the city of Los Angeles. A customer, after purchasing a bottle of mineral oil, dropped it on the sidewalk in front of the entrance to defendant’s store. Shortly thereafter plaintiff, while entering the pharmacy, slipped, fell and sustained personal injuries.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gavin v. Protestant Episcopal BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Gabriel v. Bank of ItalyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Owen v. BeauchampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. Chapman v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. Owen v. BeauchampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API