Legal Opinion

Home Bldg. & Sav. Co. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided June 1, 1928No. Docket No. 11898Published

Petitioner held not a building and loan association entitled to exemption from taxation during the years 1918, 1919, 1920, 1921, 1922, and 1923 in the meaning of section 231(4) of the Revenue Acts of 1918 and 1921.

1Opinion of the Court

HOME BUILDING & SAVINGS CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Home Bldg. & Sav. Co. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 11898.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

12 B.T.A. 289; 1928 BTA LEXIS 3566;

June 1, 1928, Promulgated

Petitioner held not a building and loan association entitled to exemption from taxation during the years 1918, 1919, 1920, 1921, 1922, and 1923 in the meaning of section 231(4) of the Revenue Acts of 1918 and 1921.

L. L. Hamby, Esq., for the petitioner.

J. Arthur Adams, Esq., for the respondent.

SIEFKIN

This is a proceeding for the redetermination of deficiencies…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lilley Building & Loan Co. v. MillerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1922
  2. Johnstown Bldg. & Loan Ass'n. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1927
  3. Broadview Sav. & Loan Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928
  4. Home Bldg. & Sav. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API