Legal Opinion
In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 13, 2010No. 03 MDL 1570(GBD)(FM)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
FRANK MAAS, United States Magistrate Judge:
I. Introduction
The plaintiffs in the civil actions comprising this multi-district litigation seek to recover damages arising out of the atrocities committed by terrorists on September II, 2001. Since the first of these actions was filed in 2002, the plaintiffs — consisting of persons who were injured, representatives of those who died, property owners, and insurers bringing subrogation claims (collectively “Plaintiffs”) — have sought to proceed against a host of defendants alleged to have had a direct or indirect…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mcgraw-Hill Global Educ. Holdings, LLC v. Mehul Mathrani, Ankush Sharma, Anshoo Sharma, & Ibestbargains, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2017
- Boehm v. SportsMem, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
- Cerovene, Inc. v. Fukuzyu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- Equipav S.A. Pavimentacao, Engenharia e Comercio Ltda. v. BertinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
- Raanan v. Binance Holdings LimitedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024