Legal Opinion

Crudup v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 12, 1989No. A89A0732PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beasley, Judge.

Defendant appeals from his conviction of improper passing, OCGA § 40-6-42, arguing three enumerations all relating to his sentence.

Defendant was tried before the court and found guilty, granted a motion for new trial, tried by a jury and found guilty. Initially, he was sentenced to 12 months imprisonment, which was suspended, and $59.95 court costs.

The stipulated transcript of evidence of the second trial states: “the judge sentenced the Defendant to a 12 month suspended sentence upon payment of the $750 fine and a $50 statutory assessment.”

Defendant contends that this sentence…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Anthony v. HopperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  3. Hewell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  4. Pressley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chambers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  2. Blake v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  3. Blake v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. Crudup v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API