Legal Opinion

Chiles v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided May 20, 1930No. 6 Div. 695PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.

This appeal is from a judgment of conviction for the offense of burglary, as charged in the first count of the indictment.

Appellant’s counsel files a purported brief in his behalf, but, as prepared, .this brief is of but slight value to this court, as no authorities are cited, and in its preparation the necessary essentials provided in Supreme Court Rule 10, vol. 4, Code 1923, p. 882, as to appellant’s brief, were disregarded, and the brief here filed in no manner conforms to the requirements of said rule.

On the trial in the court below, there was evidence tending to establish the corpus…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lowe v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1945
  2. Lindsey v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. Lindsey v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API