Marks v. State

OPINION

Kem Thompson Frost, Chief Justice

Appellant William Marks challenges his three convictions for violating the Private Security Act by accepting employment as an armed security guard without holding the proper eomimisSion. Appellant asserts that the judgments are void because the indictments -failed to negate various non-applicability sections of the Private Security Act that he claims must be negated for each of the indictments to allege an offense. Appellant also- asserts that the trial court erred in allowing the State to amend the indictments. We conclude' that the judgments-are not…