Legal Opinion
Harrison v. Salomon Bros.
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 16, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*342OPINION OF THE COURT
Edward J. Greenfield, J.
Defendant Salomon Brothers, Inc. (hereinafter Salomon Brothers) moves pursuant to sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) (9 USC §§ 3, 4) for an order staying this action and compelling arbitration of plaintiff Winifred Harrison’s (hereinafter Harrison) claims of sex discrimination. The court deems Salomon Brothers’ motion to be made under CPLR 7503 (a) as well as under the Federal statute (see, CPLR 2001).
In her complaint, Harrison alleges that she was hired by Salomon Brothers on August 9, 1982 as a salesperson in the Equity Options…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Singer v. Jefferies & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Chisolm v. Kidder, Peabody Asset Management, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Credit Suisse First Boston Corp. v. PitofskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Ersin Konkur v. Utica Academy of Science Charter SchoolNew York Court of Appeals · 2022