Legal Opinion

Pipes v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 11, 2020No. 15-1163Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 15-1163C Filed: September 11, 2020 FOR PUBLICATION MALCOLM PIPES, Keywords: Military Pay; Disability Retirement; Plaintiff, Inactive-Duty Training; 10 U.S.C. § 101(d)(7); Uniform v. Code of Military Justice; Self- Paced Fitness Improvement UNITED STATES, Program; Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record; Defendant. RCFC 52.1. Cheri L. Cannon, Tully Rinckey PLLC, Washington, D.C., for the plaintiff. Reta E. Bezak, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., Hank D. Nguyen, Air Force Legal…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Bostock v. Clayton CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  3. Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  4. King v. BurwellSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. Department of Commerce v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 2019

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API