Legal Opinion

City of Euclid v. Bittel

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 11, 1983No. 46329PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtParrino, P.J.

Defendant-appellant, Timothy Bittel, appeals his conviction for speeding in violation of Euclid Codified Ordinance Section 333.03.

Officer Thomas Hoinski of the Euclid Police Department testified at trial that defendant was traveling at a rate of thirty-eight miles per hour on Lloyd Road in Euclid. The posted speed on Lloyd Road is twenty-five miles per horn:. Officer Hoinski further stated that, in his opinion, the speed was unreasonable under the circumstances.

Defendant testified that he thought he was traveling approximately thirty-five miles per hour and that the speed was not unreasonable.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. TobinAthens County Municipal Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API