Legal Opinion
People v. Felder
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 10, 2000PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied the motion to suppress evidence seized from defendant when he was stopped for a curfew violation by parole officers with the assistance of a Syracuse police officer. We reject the contention of defendant that the stop was illegal in the absence of exigent circumstances because it was not conducted by his own parole officer (see, People v Van Buren, 198 AD2d 533, lv denied 83 NY2d 811). Defendant further contends that the curfew violation was a pretext and that the parole officers were acting as agents of the police…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. CandelariaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- People v. MackieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- People v. Van BurenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. NappiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. FarmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. PorterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. PetersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.