Legal Opinion
Frank MOLNAR, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES OTIS ELEVATOR, Defendant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 6, 1994No. 94-1441PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAUER, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Frank Molnar filed this suit against United Technologies Otis Elevator (“Otis”) for violating the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. A jury found that Otis violated the ADEA, awarded Molnar $75,000 in compensatory damages, and determined that Otis’ violation was willful, which resulted in a doubling of the damages award to $150,000. Otis now appeals, and we affirm.
Molnar worked as an elevator mechanic for Otis from 1985 to October 1989 in the area in and around South Bend, Indiana. Fred Stickovieh, Otis’ office manager in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. John C. Best, Gregory J. Bewick and Paul F. ConartyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
3Cited by13 opinions
- Allstate Insurance Companies v. Charles HerronCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Gagan v. American Cablevision, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Edward Pavlick v. Jimmy MifflinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Anthony C. Mathis v. Phillips Chevrolet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Vanesse Fort, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Eric K. Fort, Deceased v. C.W. Keller Trucking, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.