State v. Fish
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
893 P.2d 1023 (1995)
321 Or. 48
STATE of Oregon, Respondent on Review,
v.
Boyd Alan FISH, Petitioner on Review.
DC 90-11996; CA A67743; SC S40015.
Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.
Argued and Submitted August 31, 1993.
Reargued and Resubmitted November 2, 1994.
Reassigned November 3, 1994.
Decided April 27, 1995.
John Henry Hingson III, Oregon City, argued the cause and filed the petition on behalf of petitioner on review.
Jonathan H. Fussner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause on behalf of respondent on review.
UNIS, Justice.
On May 24, 1990, defendant was driving his Ford Bronco southbound on a…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Gillette; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Hoomissen; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Graber.
2Cases cited110 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.