Legal Opinion

Union Bank v. Case

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 6, 1903PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from City Court of New York, Special Term. Three actions by the Union Bank of Brooklyn against David K.. Case individually and as trustee. From an order in each action affirming a taxation of costs, plaintiff appeals. Reversed.

1Opinion of the CourtBlanchard, J.

These actions were brought upon promissory notes against, the maker and indorsers. The maker did not defend. The indorser successfully defended, and obtained a verdict of the jury in his favor.

In action No. I it was stipulated that the other actions should abide the event of that trial. At the time the verdict was rendered, the defendant moved for an additional allowance, which was granted, and upon the stipulation a verdict was directed in favor of the defendant in the other two actions. The successful defendant did not ask specifically for costs. On the taxation of costs by the clerk the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Canavan v. Emze Cosmetic Shop, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  2. Weinreb v. Coleman Stable Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API