Legal Opinion

O'Neill v. Keeling

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 12, 1939No. 44645PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

The arrest, in this case, was under a valid warrant; the accused was indicted under the name '‘Bert O’Neil” and this was the name given in the warrant. Under this warrant, plaintiff was arrested, placed in jail overnight and the following morning he was arraigned. The prosecuting witness was sent for and, being confronted with the accused, at once, stated he was not the man who committed the offense. "Whereupon, plaintiff was discharged. He brought this action for damages for false imprisonment. There was a trial, resulting in a directed verdict for defendants, and plaintiff has appealed.

Brief…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jones v. Van BeverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Henke v. McCordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  3. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  4. Blocker v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. Wilson v. LaphamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Children v. BurtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  2. State v. DettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. Bean v. BestSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  4. State Ex Rel. Matko v. ZieglerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State v. PaulsenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API