Legal Opinion

Loguidice v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1915PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Eeror to review a judgment of the circuit court for Rock county: GeoRge Grimm, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff in error was charged with having committed a serious criminal offense. There was an examination and he was held to bail for trial. In due course, the cause reached the circuit court.

Read the full summary

Eeror to review a judgment of the circuit court for Rock county: GeoRge Grimm, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff in error was charged with having committed a serious criminal offense. There was an examination and he was held to bail for trial. In due course, the cause reached the circuit court. The prosecuting attorney supposing that the scope of the examination disclosed probability of guilt on several grounds informed against the accused thus in substance : 1. Defendant at the time and place mentioned maliciously mutilated the lips of Francisca D’Amore. 2. Defendant at such time and place…

1Opinion of the CourtMaeshaxl, J.

Various complaints are made by counsel on the part of plaintiff in error, but, we must confess, after carefully examining the record, there is very little which' merits more than passing notice.

Some six distinct motions were made on behalf of the accused before the matter came down to the point of impaneling the jury. Adverse rulings on each motion were excepted to and we are ashed to review them in detail, besides two motions made on the trial, one to direct a verdict in favor of the accused and one to set aside the verdict and grant a new trial.

Five of the motions made before the jury were…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lefevre v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Wittig v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  3. People v. WeiserMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API