Pierce Mill Co. v. Koltermann
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Pierce county. Tried below before Crawford, J. cited: Willoughby v. Shipman, 28 Mo. 50; O’Brien v. Oity of St. Paul, 18 Minn. 176; Solms v. Bias, 16 Abb. Prac. (N. Y.) 311; Williams v. Morland, 4 D. & R. 583. cited: ParJcer v. Boston & Maine B. B., 3 Cush. (Mass.) 107; People v. Murray, 5 Hill, 468.
1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.
This action was tried in the district court of Pierce county, and was brought to this court on the petition of the Pierce Mill Company, the plaintiff in error.
Koltcrmann and Griebnow, the plaintiffs below, allege that they are the owners of certain described tracts of land in township 26 in said county; that the north fork of the Elkhorn river is a natural water course running through and across their lands; that in the year 1883, the defendant, a corporation duly organized under the laws of this state, erected a dam about nine feet high across said water •course, and built a water grist mill…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Meister v. KrotterNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
- Meister v. KrotterNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
- Newcomb v. RoyceNebraska Supreme Court · 1894