Legal Opinion

Maville v. Donaghue

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided January 8, 1948Published

1Opinion of the CourtSkerritt, J.

Plaintiff agreed to paint and repair defendant’s house for $300. When the job was half done defendant pointed out certain defects, and told the plaintiff in vigorous language to make them good or quit. Plaintiff quit immediately, and brought this action for breach of contract.

Though a good painter, plaintiff failed to fulfill his implied obligation to do this work in a good and workmanlike manner. The contract was entire; and having broken it, he cannot now recover in an action based upon it. The rule is that recovery on an entire contract requires full performance or a valid excuse. Nor .can…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Spence v. . HamNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Nieman-Irving & Co. v. LazenbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. Apparel & Accessories Associates, Inc. v. New York World's Fair 1940 Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  4. Apparel & Accessories Associates, Inc. v. New York World's Fair 1940 Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Barney's Clothes, Inc. v. W. B. O. Broadcasting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API