Legal Opinion

Hyatt v. Matal

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 23, 2022No. Civil Action No. 2009-1872Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ________________________________________ ) GILBERT P. HYATT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) KATHERINE K. VIDAL, ) Civil Action No. 05-2310 ) 09-1864 Under Secretary of Commerce ) 09-1869 for Intellectual Property and ) 09-1872 Director of the United States ) Patent and Trademark Office, ) ) Defendant. ) ________________________________________ ) MEMORANDUM OPINION This opinion concerns the complex principles underlying equitable defenses—when used by and against the government—as well as the strange circumstance of applying the Federal…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. United States v. AbelSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API