Legal Opinion
Lahens v. AT&T Mobility Puerto Rico, Inc.
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided December 17, 2020No. 3:18-cv-01776Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO FÉLIX LAHENS, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL NO.: 18-1776 (MEL) AT&T MOBILITY PUERTO RICO, INC., et al. Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER I. Procedural Background On February 3, 2020, AT&T Mobility Puerto Rico, Inc. (“Defendant”) filed a motion for summary judgment against Mr. Félix Lahens (“Plaintiff’). ECF No. 46. On September 8, 2020, the court dismissed with prejudice Plaintiff’s federal claims pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”),
29 U.S.C. §§ 621
et. seq.; Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”),
42 U.S.C. §§ 12101
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Jose R. ALVAREZ-FONSECA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PEPSI COLA OF PUERTO RICO BOTTLING COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Santini Rivera v. Serv Air, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1994
- Vázquez-Filippetti v. Banco Popular De Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Garcia-Garcia v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.