Milot v. Reed
Montana Supreme Court
Appeal from Sixth Judicial District, Meagher County. Action on covenants of warranty in a deed. Defendant’s demurrer was overruled and judgment rendered for plaintiff by Henry, J.
1Opinion of the CourtHarwood, J.
The facts constituting the cause of action in this case are as follows: On the 10th of September, 1890, defendant, by deed of conveyance duly executed and delivered to plaintiff, conveyed to him certain real estate situate in the town of Castle, Meagher County, Mont. Said deed contained a covenant in the following words: “ And the said party of the first part, and his heirs, do héreby covenant that he will forever warrant and defend his right, title, and interest in and to said premises, and the quiet and peaceable possession thereof, unto the said party of the second part, his heirs and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Huyck v. . AndrewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Douglass v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Foley v. City of HaverhillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Reed v. PierceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1853
- Daggett v. ReasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Schuster v. Northern Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1953