Knox v. Akowskey
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
Defendants appeal from a judgment against them in an action for damage to a motor vehicle. A detailed statement of the evidence is unnecessary. Plaintiff’s vehicle entered an uncontrolled intersection where it was struck on the right rear by a truck owned by defendant Carson and driven by defendant Knox.-
Defendants seek to escape liability on the ground that the collision was an unavoidable accident due to a sudden failure of the brakes on the truck. However, there was testimony that the truck driver stated immediately after the collision that he was on his way to have…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wright v. Capital Transit Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- Radinsky v. EllisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
- Lyons v. Liberty Nat. BankDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1937
- Rosasco v. SowderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
3Cited by15 opinions
- Watts v. SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
- Rakich v. Anthem Blue Cross & Blue ShieldOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
- American Service Center Associates v. HeltonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Gamble v. SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Taylor v. KingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.