Legal Opinion

State v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 26, 1981No. 27589, CA 19383PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

Defendant was tried before a jury and convicted of first degree theft. ORS 164.055.1 Defendant contends the trial court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal and in admitting inadmissible hearsay. We affirm.

Defendant contends the evidence was insufficient to support a verdict of guilty. The test, as stated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 US 307, 99 S Ct 2781, 61 L Ed 2d 560, 573 (1979), and as adopted by the court in State v. Harris, 288 Or 703, 721, 609 P2d 798 (1980), is " * * * whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecutor, any rational…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. KlamertOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. ShearerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API