State v. Taylor
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.
Defendant was tried before a jury and convicted of first degree theft. ORS 164.055.1 Defendant contends the trial court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal and in admitting inadmissible hearsay. We affirm.
Defendant contends the evidence was insufficient to support a verdict of guilty. The test, as stated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 US 307, 99 S Ct 2781, 61 L Ed 2d 560, 573 (1979), and as adopted by the court in State v. Harris, 288 Or 703, 721, 609 P2d 798 (1980), is " * * * whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecutor, any rational…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. KlamertOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. ShearerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990