Admiral Corp. v. Sewing Machine Sales Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
LEVET, District Judge.
The plaintiff has moved for an order compelling the production of certain documents and records. The defendants have made a cross-motion for summary judgment or in the alternative for an order directing separate trials on the issues of liability and damages.
This is an action for trade-mark infringement and unfair competition arising out of defendants’ use of the word “Admiral” on sewing machines sold by them. Plaintiff originally sought injunctive relief, an accounting for profits, damages and attorney’s fees. On May 21, 1954, a consent judgment was entered enjoining…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Champion Spark Plug Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Triangle Publications, Inc. v. RohrlichCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Admiral Corp. v. Penco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Chester H. Roth, Inc. v. Esquire, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Stardust, Inc. v. WeissDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.