Legal Opinion · Dissent

Weaver v. Commonwealth

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 2005No. 2003-SC-0353-DGPublished

1DissentKeller, Justice

Because KRS 520.010(2) specifically excludes “constraint incidental to release on bail” from the definition of custody, the Appellant may not be charged with escape from custody under KRS 520.030 for violating home incarceration as a form of pretrial release. If KRS 520.010(2)’s definition of custody is “unwise or impolitic, the remedy rests with the Legislature; not with the courts .... We have no authority to change or alter the established rules of law. Our functions are judicial, not legislative. We sit here to declare what the law is, and not what it ought to be.”1 Accordingly, I dissent.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Drury v. FrankeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  2. Camera Center, Inc. v. Revenue CabinetKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. FellhauerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Dixon v. CaudillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  5. State v. FaulknerOhio Court of Appeals · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API