Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Scott

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided December 8, 2017No. 16-1434PPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAYATTA, Circuit Judge.

Michael David Scott claims, among other things, that the district court acted improperly in rejecting a plea agreement he had negotiated with the government, in not allowing him to negotiate and submit a new agreement, and in sentencing him before he read the presentence report (“PSR”). Finding no combination of error and prejudice sufficient to set aside Scott’s sentence, we affirm,

I. Background

In August 2010, the government charged Scott with wire and bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C §§ 1343-44 and unlawful monetary transactions in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1957,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. SepulvedaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. SaccocciaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. Honorable Henry F. Werker, United States District Judge, United States of America v. Harry Santos-FigueroaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  4. United States v. Walter F. CurranCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Robert Alan BerzonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hoolahan v. IBC Advanced Alloys Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
  2. United States v. Perez-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
  3. United States v. Charles York Walker, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  4. United States v. Charles Walker, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
  5. United States v. Charles York Walker, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API