Legal Opinion

Hormel v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 3, 1954PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOCK, District Judge.

Plaintiffs sue respectively for $428.77 and $398, alleged to be due them as balances of the 1948 special dividends on their policies of National Service Life Insurance. The Government contends that nothing is due because the amounts sued for are properly withheld from plaintiffs’ dividends since plaintiffs owe the Government the amounts which they now seek to recover. The Government’s claim is that plaintiffs owe the amounts in question because the Government has paid those amounts to the New York Life Insurance Company for their account pursuant to the Governmental…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. American Communications Assn. v. DoudsSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Hahn v. Gray, Jr., Administrator of Veterans' AffairsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
  5. United States v. GudewiczDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Whittier v. EmmetCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
  2. DiSilvestro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  3. United States v. DaubendiekDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1959
  4. United States v. OwensDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1957
  5. United States v. LawrenceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API